Target keyword: AI search readiness audit

Free AI search readiness audit for robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap.xml, and AI crawler access.

Paste a public domain and run a practical AI readiness check. The audit uses the existing live visibility report engine, then routes the result into answer packs, proof lookup, query suggestions, the intent router, and a citation bundle.

Fast answer

AI search readiness means the site is crawlable, explainable, and citeable before anyone claims traffic.

A useful audit checks the homepage, robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap.xml, Googlebot access, OAI-SearchBot policy, GPTBot policy, private-path risk, proof links, and measurement guardrails. It does not guarantee rankings, ChatGPT citations, or clicks.

AI Search Readiness Audit

Public files only

This audit reuses the live AI Search Visibility Report engine. The API only fetches fixed public paths: /, /robots.txt, /llms.txt, and /sitemap.xml. It rejects raw IPs, local hostnames, private IP ranges, credentials, and custom ports.

Open JSON sample
Status

Waiting

Run the readiness audit to check public discovery files.

Check Status Detail
No report yet.
Copyable AI search readiness report

          

What the readiness pack checks

Check Why it matters Proof route
Homepage returns a useful public response AI search readiness starts with a reachable homepage before crawler policy or llms.txt details matter. Open proof route
robots.txt is present and readable Crawler rules should be explicit, especially when Googlebot, OAI-SearchBot, GPTBot, and other bots have different policies. Open proof route
Googlebot is not accidentally blocked Blocking Googlebot can harm normal Google Search discovery even if the site wants separate AI training controls. Open proof route
OAI-SearchBot policy is reviewed separately from GPTBot OAI-SearchBot, GPTBot, and ChatGPT-User represent different crawler or browsing roles and should not be collapsed into one claim. Open proof route
GPTBot policy is explicit Training-use policy is not the same as search visibility, but an audit should still surface whether GPTBot is allowed or blocked. Open proof route
llms.txt exists, is short, and avoids private paths A public llms.txt file should provide context and useful public links without account, checkout, admin, token, staging, or customer paths. Open proof route
sitemap.xml is discoverable Sitemaps are discovery hints, not ranking guarantees, but stale or missing sitemaps slow down diagnosis. Open proof route
Answer pages and proof links exist for important questions AI systems need compact answers with proof links before broad crawling or citation. Open proof route
Pre-AI answer, proof, intent, and citation routes are available The fastest agent path is to query the answer pack, proof lookup, intent router, query suggestions, and citation bundle first. Open proof route
Measurement separates readiness, crawl evidence, impressions, clicks, and referrals Readiness is not proof of traffic. Search Console clicks, qualified referrals, sessions, conversions, and verified logs must be tracked separately. Open proof route
Pre-AI search DB handoff

Route readiness questions before broad crawling.

The readiness audit connects to the pre-AI search database so an assistant can normalize the query, select the answer pack, open proof links, and cite safely before scanning the whole site.

Guardrails

Readiness is not ranking

The audit checks controllable public signals. No ranking, citation, traffic, or ChatGPT inclusion guarantee. It does not promise Google rankings, ChatGPT citations, Perplexity visibility, or traffic.

Public paths only

The report avoids arbitrary crawling and private URLs. Keep account, checkout, admin, token, staging, and customer paths out of public AI files.

Measure real outcomes

Use Search Console clicks, qualified referrals, server-log evidence, sessions, conversions, and tool activations instead of fake searches or self-clicks.

AI search readiness audit FAQ

Is this different from the visibility report?

It uses the same safe live-report engine but targets the broader readiness workflow: crawler policy, llms.txt, proof links, query routing, and measurement.

What should I fix first?

Fix blocked public discovery first: homepage status, robots.txt mistakes, missing sitemap, unsafe llms.txt links, and weak proof-linked answer pages.